Tag Archives: Partners

Channel Advocacy

Advocacy is a hot topic in marketing circles not least because social networks have increased the speed and spread of advocacy effects.  Company reputations are built more rapidly and eroded even faster. Pockets of ignorance, which buffered companies in the past, are dwindling. A whole new branch of marketing is emerging – social media marketing. At its core are well understood principles of advocacy and loyalty.

Advocacy is so powerful, it can be used as a leading indicator of sales, as shown in Marsden, Samson & Upton’s 2005 paper, “Advocacy Drives Growth“.  Using a survey of UK adult consumers, they found that a 2% reduction in negative word of mouth correlated with just under 1% growth in sales, whilst a 7% increase in word of mouth advocacy correlated with a 1% growth in sales. Perhaps companies should put over 3 times the resource in trying to satisfy the unhappy as they do in making those who are satisfied, happier. The squeaky wheel gets the oil should be the operative phrase.

With social networks, squeaky wheels are amplified, but only heard by corporates if their ears are tuned to multiple frequencies. A watchful ear to social media wires isn’t enough. Honest conversation over a variety of media is required. In B2B, that often means frequent, in depth, probing conversations with channel partners, something that can’t be derived from a web survey that bounds and stifles conversation.  Ask the question,  pioneered by Fred Reichheld, “How likely would you be to recommend…?” in such a way that you get an honest answer from a partner.  Then ask them why they said that.


Leave a comment

Filed under Social Networks

Leads – SharePoint or ShareSplodge?

I got it again yesterday.  Speaking with a partner they moaned about not getting leads. If I had a nickel for every time….  It is such an old chestnut and this is its root. There is, always has been, and always will be a fundamental schism between how many people in channel partners view vendors’ abilities to generate demand and how many people in vendors view those same abilities in channel partners.

Many people in vendors think that because a partner gets a discount, the partner should be chiefly responsible for generating demand for the vendor’s brand.  They overestimate a partner’s ability to promote a vendor’s brand and the margin that a partner is able to earn.  The smaller the vendor, the more often one hears this view– and it comes most frequently from direct salespeople promoted into roles where they have overall responsibility for direct and indirect sales. Conversely, partners think that because vendors attract prospects, there is a secret honey pot of leads that they only get rare, teasing glimpses of.  They overestimate two things: the ability of a vendor to promote that vendor’s brand; and the vendor’s ability to identify, qualify and manage leads.

Vendors are not well equipped to identify who expresses an interest in their offerings.    That is not just for new prospects. Vendors are often are not very good at identifying opportunity in loyal customers.  There is a gap between touch points – all the times a customer interacts with a brand –  and a potential sale. It often comes from a vendor failing to ask or not having the opportunity to ask “Why?” or “What are you using it for?” or “How will you do things differently in the future?”  Plus, customers, often don’t know those answers either because a need and a solution become recursive.  There is a gap too, because vendors lack processes to turn a download or web visit or a tweet into a frank conversation that could reveal a need that the vendor could profitably fulfil.  That is what keeps marketers up at night. Partners don’t understand how much a vendor doesn’t know. Godot isn’t coming. There is no honey pot. 

Let us say all those touch points could become qualified leads with accurate details on budget allocated, who has authority and a decision influence, what need is being satisfied and the timeframe for the project. How could they be fairly distributed?  A single lead for a single, simple project could be the product of multiple touch points within a number of partners, strategic alliance members and vendors. It is not a simple, closed system.  The honey pot is more like opaque, week old goulash, more ShareSplodge than SharePoint.

As for vendors, understand where your channel partners make their profits and the competitive pressures on their business and you will begin to understand their priorities, their mountains and your molehills.  As a salesperson you know you need to walk a mile in your customer’s shoes.  Try on a business partner’s pair for a change.

Leave a comment

Filed under Indirect